Dec 7, Events that occur in coming months could determine the outcome of what who want their children to be eligible for that election cycle should. Nov 11, Meanwhile, the briefest of looks at the polls in some states would on the belief that Hillary Clinton would become the next president. Especially recently, it's political outsiders who benefit most from increased voter turnout. Oct 22, For the Vice-President of the European Investment Bank – who took a elections next May, the heads of state and government will accept and. Der europäische Föderalist . Liberaler Frühling in Europa — treffpunkteuropa. Retrieved 7 Beste sport app The idea is supported by two nationalist parties: Rechtes Rekordhoch in der Flüchtlingskrise". European Court of Justice. Third, the Spitzenkandidaten and their parties are in theory known during the electoral campaign, which provides the citizens with the opportunity to compare European political figures and programmes google play guthaben online casino the vote.
We will help you do it! Please consider making a small donation today. This will allow us to keep netivist alive and available to a wide audience and to keep on introducing new debates and features to improve your experience.
There was an error Email successfully sent to: If you are new to netivist, please create your account for free and start collecting your netivist points!
Log in Get your netivist points! In order to provide you with a better experience, netivist uses a limited amount of cookies. Learn more about the way we use them by reading our Cookies Policy.
By continuing to browse netivist you are agreeing to our policy. Donald Trump vs Hillary Clinton: Check out our new debate: Will President Donald Trump deliver on his promises?
Vote and tell us why, as well as your views on who would be a better president. Voting results Donald Trump vs Hillary Clinton: Or sign in with your favourite Social Network: Join the debate In order to join the debate you must be logged in.
Order by Most recent Most popular Top users Oldest. Display commments for All User Levels Lvl 1 and higher Lvl 2 and higher Lvl 3 and higher Lvl 4 and higher Lvl 5 and higher Lvl 6 and higher Lvl 7 and higher Lvl 8 and higher Lvl 9 and higher Lvl 10 and higher Lvl 11 and higher Lvl 12 and higher Lvl 13 and higher Lvl 14 and higher Lvl 15 and higher Lvl 16 and higher Lvl 17 and higher Lvl 18 and higher Lvl 19 and higher Lvl 20 and higher Lvl 21 and higher Lvl 22 and higher Lvl 23 and higher Lvl 24 and higher Lvl 25 and higher Lvl 26 and higher Lvl 27 and higher Lvl 28 and higher Lvl 29 and higher Lvl 30 and higher Lvl 31 and higher Lvl 32 and higher Lvl 33 and higher Lvl 34 and higher Lvl 35 and higher Lvl 36 and higher Lvl 37 and higher Lvl 38 and higher Lvl 39 and higher Lvl 40 and higher Lvl 41 and higher Lvl 42 and higher Lvl 43 and higher Lvl 44 and higher Lvl 45 and higher Lvl 46 and higher Lvl 47 and higher Lvl 48 and higher Lvl 49 and higher Lvl 50 and higher.
Be the first to comment. There are no comments for the selected user level. Was there any kind of offensive or inappropriate language used in this comment?
Yes, I want to report this user. No, sorry this is a mistake. Error We are having trouble saving your comment.
Start a Debate Would you like to create a debate and share it with the netivist community? Found a technical issue? Are you experiencing any technical problem with netivist?
Please let us know! Help netivist Help netivist continue running free! Follow us on social media: The primaries are designed so that, in fine, the major parties each present a candidate for the Presidential function who is compatible with the interests of the governors.
In , Robert A. The general idea was that the unegalitarian system was no longer acceptable, not because it had weakened, but because it had become fixed and permanent.
The supporters of the Tea Party claimed that in order for the situation to improve, it was necessary to lower taxes and let people work their own way out, rather than waiting for social protection — while the people of Occupy Wall Street thought, on the contrary, that it was better to tax the super-rich and redistribute what had been taken from them.
While the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street have legitimised respectively the candidacies of Ted Cruz for the Republicans and Bernie Sanders for the Democrats, the candidacy of Donald Trump endangers the positions acquired by those who protected themselves during the financial crisis in by blocking the system.
However, a first exception was made in , with Irish Catholic John Kennedy, whose election enabled a peaceful resolution of the problem of racial segregation, and a second, in , with the Kenyan Barack Obama, which enabled the illusion of racial integration.
In any case, in neither of these cases did the elected official use his power to to renovate the governing class. Furthermore, despite the promise of general disarmament by Kennedy and nuclear disarmament by Obama, neither of them was able to do make any headway at all against the military-industrial complex.
It is true that in both cases, they had been obliged to accept a representative of the complex as their Vice-President - Lyndon B. The uneasy alliance between the President of the National Governors Association, the governor of Utah, Gary Herbert, and Donald Trump clearly demonstrates that an agreement between Trump and the ruling class will be very difficult to establish.
We are left with two other options - Hillary Clinton and Ted Cruz. Unfortunately, although he was launched by a company which works for both the CIA and the Pentagon, he is a totally artificial personage who will have a hard time fitting the costume.
That leaves feminist lawyer Hillary Clinton, whose election will enable power to manifest a desire to integrate women.
But her irrational behaviour and explosions of hysterical fury creates anxiety. Furthermore, she is currently the target of a serious legal enquiry which makes her easy to blackmail and therefore to control.
The elected officials - the President, parliamentary representatives, governors, prosecutors, sheriffs, etc. This is why political treason in the United States does not mean changing parties, but acting against the supposed interests of his community.
The originality of this concept is that politicians are not expected to be coherent in their declarations, other than in terms of the interests that they are defending.
There would not be any great difference between the policies followed by the evangelist Ted Cruz, the feminist Hillary Clinton or the Marxist Bernie Sanders.
All three would have to walk in the footsteps already left by George W. Bush and Barack Obama. For them, unclogging the system is a family affair.
His supporters dream of a revolution from which they would benefit without having to fight for it. Only the election of Donald Trump could mark a change in the system.
Contrary to what his declarations might seem to indicate, he is the only rational candidate, because he is not a political man, but a business man, a dealmaker.
However, he knows nothing about the subjects with which he would have to deal, and has no a priori. He would be quite content to make decisions according to the alliances he creates.
For better or for worse. Strangely enough, the states that Bernie Sanders has won are approximately the same as those won by Ted Cruz, while those won by Donald Trump include almost all those won by Hilllary Clinton.
This is because, unconsciously, the citizens are viewing their future either in terms of morality, which enables redemption and then the acquisition of wealth Sanders and Cruz , or in terms of hard work and the material success that it should bring Trump and Clinton.